4.7 Article

Mirtazapine Alters Cue-Associated Methamphetamine Seeking in Rats

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 275-281

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.032

关键词

Atypical antidepressant; cue reactivity; methamphetamine; reinstatement; self-administration

资金

  1. [USPHSG DA015760]
  2. [DA016496]
  3. [DA024923]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Methamphetamine (METH) is a potent psychostimulant, repeated use of which can result in a substance abuse disorder. Withdrawn individuals are highly prone to relapse, which may be driven, at least in part, by a hyperresponsivity to METH-associated cues that can prompt METH-seeking. Clinically efficacious pharmacotherapies for METH abuse are critically needed. Mirtazapine (Remeron) is an atypical antidepressant that antagonizes activated norepinephrine(alpha 2), histamine(1) serotonin (5-HT)(2A/C), and 5-HT3 receptors. This pharmacologic profile prompted our interest in its potential for preventing relapse to METH-taking. This study tested the hypothesis that mirtazapine would attenuate METH-seeking in rats trained to self-administer METH. Methods: Rats were trained to self-administer METH in a lever-pressing operant task. The effect of mirtazapine on METH-seeking was determined by evaluating lever pressing in the presence of cues previously associated with METH, but in the absence of METH reinforcement. Two paradigms were used: cue reactivity, wherein rats do not undergo extinction training, and a cue-induced reinstatement paradigm after extinction. Results: Mirtazapine (5.0 mg/kg) pretreatment reduced METH-seeking by similar to 50% in the first 15 min of cue reactivity and cue-induced reinstatement testing. This mirtazapine dose did not significantly affect motor performance. Conclusions: This study revealed the overlapping nature of cue reactivity and cue-induced reinstatement procedures and provided preclinical evidence that mirtazapine can attenuate METH-seeking behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据