4.7 Article

Insomnia Severity Is Associated with a Decreased Volume of the CA3/Dentate Gyrus Hippocampal Subfield

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 68, 期 5, 页码 494-496

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.035

关键词

Dentate gyrus; hippocampus; magnetic resonance imaging; neurogenesis; posttraumatic stress disorder; sleep

资金

  1. Mental Illness Research and Education Clinical Center of the US Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development
  2. Department of Defense
  3. National Center for Research Resource of the National Institutes of Health [RR23953]
  4. National Institute for Mental Health [TCN: MH057157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Prolonged disruption of sleep in animal studies is associated with decreased neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. Our objective was to determine whether insomnia severity in a sample of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) patients and control subjects was associated with decreased volume in the CA3/dentate hippocampal subfield. Methods: Volumes of hippocampal subfields in 17 veteran men positive for PTSD (41 +/- 12 years) and 19 age-matched male veterans negative for PTSD were measured with 4-T magnetic resonance imaging. Subjective sleep quality was measured by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Results: Higher scores on the ISI, indicating worse insomnia, were associated with smaller volumes of the CA3/dentate subfields (r = -.48, p < .01) in the combined sample. Adding the ISI score as a predictor for CA3/dentate volume to a hierarchical linear regression model after first controlling for age and PTSD symptoms accounted for a 13% increase in incremental variance (t = 2.47, p = .02). Conclusions: The findings indicate for the first time in humans that insomnia severity is associated with volume loss of the CA3/dentate subfields. This is consistent with animal studies showing that chronic sleep disruption is associated with decreased neurogenesis and dendritic branching in these structures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据