4.7 Article

A Novel Transgenic Mouse for Gene-Targeting Within Cells That Express Corticotropin-Releasing Factor

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 67, 期 12, 页码 1212-1216

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.01.026

关键词

Amygdala; corticotropin releasing factor; Cre-recom binase; lentiviral vector; promoter specificity; transgenic

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [MH-42088, MH079667A, MH-541380, MH-77083, MH-69056, MH-58922, MH-39415, DA019624, RR-00039]
  2. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  3. Lundbeck
  4. Pfizer
  5. National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD)
  6. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  7. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  8. Whitehall Foundation [MH069852, MH072908]
  9. AFSP
  10. Eli Lilly
  11. GlaxoSmithKline
  12. Cyberonics
  13. Ortho-McNell Janssen
  14. AstraZeneca
  15. Dainippon Sumitomo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) orchestrates the mammalian endocrine, autonomic, and behavioral stress response and has been implicated in the pathophysiology of illnesses ranging from irritable bowel syndrome to mood and anxiety disorders. CRF is produced and released from a variety of cell types, making it difficult to distinguish the specific role of CRF from other neurotransmitters with which it colocalizes. To clarify the basic biology of the CRF neuron, we must be able to manipulate selectively CRFergic cells. Here we describe a novel transgenic mouse using 3.0 kb of the CRF promoter to drive expression of Cre-recombinase (CRFp3.0Cre). Crossing CRFp3.0Cre with a fluorescent reporter strain results in Cre-dependent green fluorescent protein expression within CRF-producing cells. Thus, CRF cells can be identified for single-cell polymerase chain reaction and electrophysiological procedures. Furthermore, the CRFp3.0Cre transgenic can be combined with other available mouse strains containing a floxed gene of interest to allow unparalleled detailed analysis of the CRF system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据