4.7 Article

Elevated Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Levels in Chronic Schizophrenia

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 68, 期 7, 页码 667-670

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.05.016

关键词

Anterior cingulate cortex; GABA; glutamate; MEGAPRESS; MRS; psychosis

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [5K23MH079982]
  2. Counter-Drug Technology Assessment Center
  3. Army Contracting Agency [DABT63-99-C]
  4. National Institutes of Health [S10 RR13938]
  5. Eli Lilly
  6. GlaxoSmithKline
  7. Roche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Despite widely replicated abnormalities of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurons in schizophrenia postmortem, few studies have measured tissue GABA levels in vivo. We used proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure tissue GABA levels in participants with schizophrenia and healthy control subjects in the anterior cingulate cortex and parieto-occipital cortex. Methods: Twenty-one schizophrenia participants effectively treated on a stable medication regimen (mean age 39.0, 14 male) and 19 healthy control subjects (mean age 36.3, 12 male) underwent a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy scan using GABA-selective editing at 4 Tesla after providing informed consent. Data were collected from two 16.7-mL voxels and analyzed using LCModel. Results: We found elevations in GABA/creatine in the schizophrenia group compared with control subjects (F(1,65) = 4.149, p = .046] in both brain areas (15.5% elevation in anterior cingulate cortex, 11.9% in parieto-occipital cortex). We also found a positive correlation between GABA/creatine and glutamate/creatine, which was not accounted for by % GM or brain region. Conclusions: We found elevated GABA/creatinine in participants with chronically treated schizophrenia. Postmortem studies report evidence for dysfunctional GABAergic neurotransmission in schizophrenia. Elevated GABA levels, whether primary to illness or compensatory to another process, may be associated with dysfunctional GABAergic neurotransmission in chronic schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据