4.7 Article

Compensation and Disease Severity on the Memory-Related Activations in Mild Cognitive Impairment

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 68, 期 10, 页码 894-902

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.02.004

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; compensation; disease severity; episodic memory; fMRI; mild cognitive impairment

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Alzheimer's disease is a neurodegenerative disease with progressive cognitive impairments that are likely to affect the compensatory mechanisms and the cerebral activation patterns of the patients Methods Functional neuroimaging was used to test the effect of disease severity on the brain activation of persons at risk for Alzheimer's disease and to highlight the process of compensation in some of these individuals This was done for the verbal learning of either semantically related or semantically unrelated word pairs Twenty six persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were separated into two groups MCI higher cognition and MCI lower-cognition with a split-median on their scores for the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale A group of 14 healthy older adults were matched to the MCI participants Results In both task conditions MCI higher cognition activated additional regions relative to control subjects in the right ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal brain areas Additional areas of hyperactivation were found in the right prefrontal area 45 when encoding semantically related word pairs and in the left hippocampus during encoding of unrelated word pairs In contrast MCI lower cognition failed to show additional prefrontal activations when compared with healthy control subjects and showed decreased activation in posterior areas Conclusions These results are in line with compensation occurring at the beginning of the MCI continuum and with the breakdown of compensation in patients experiencing more severe symptoms

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据