4.6 Article

Germline and somatic mutation analysis of MLH3 in MSI-positive colorectal cancer

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 157, 期 2, 页码 347-352

出版社

AMER SOC INVESTIGATIVE PATHOLOGY, INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64546-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is characteristic of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, and occurs in a subset (10 to 15%) of unselected colorectal cancer cases. In hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, MSI is caused by defects in five mismatch repair genes, and in sporadic cases the main cause seems to be somatic MLH1 promoter methylation. Most Likely additional hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer genes remain to be discovered. Genes with simple repeats in their coding region are often targets for deletions in MSI-positive tumors. Several genes (TGF beta RII, IGFIIR, MSH3, MSH6, BAX, MBD4) with significance in tumorigenesis harbor repeats in their coding regions and are often somatically inactivated because of deletions causing frameshifts, Recently, a novel human mismatch repair gene, MLH3, was cloned and shown to be involved in mammalian mismatch repair. To evaluate the possible role of MLH3 in hereditary cancer, we performed germline single-strand conformation polymorphism-analysis for 52 patients displaying features of inherited colorectal cancer. Forty-six of these had been diagnosed with MSI-positive tumors. No germline mutations were found. Similar to MSH3 and MSH6, MLH3 harbors mononucleotide repeats, ie, (A(6))-(A(9)), in its coding region, which makes it a putative target for somatic mutations in MSI-positive tumors, To evaluate its somatic inactivation we performed a deletion search focusing on eight exonic MLH3 mononucleotide repeats in a series of 93 MSI-positive tumors, Somatic deletions were found In 8.6% of the samples, a frequency similar to one detected in neutral noncoding mononucleotide repeats. No evidence of involvement of MLH3 in MSI tumorigenesis was obtained.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据