4.7 Article

Simulating Neurocognitive Aging: Effects of a Dopaminergic Antagonist on Brain Activity During Working Memory

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 67, 期 6, 页码 575-580

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.12.013

关键词

Aging; antagonist; D1 receptors; dopamine; fMRI; pharmacology; spatial working memory

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Brain Power
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Research Award
  4. Joint Committee for Nordic Research Councils for the Humanities and the Social Sciences
  5. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous correlational studies have indirectly linked dysfunctional dopaminergic neurotransmission to age-related cognitive deficits and associated reductions in task-induced functional brain activity. Methods: We used an experimental-pharmacological functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) approach to more directly examine the role of dopamine in neurocognitive aging. Twenty younger and 20 healthy older adults were included. During fMRI scanning, a spatial working memory (SWM) task was administered under two conditions, varying in cognitive load. Positron emission tomography measurements with the D1 receptor antagonist [(11)C]SCH23390 confirmed that a given experimental dose of unlabeled solution occupied 50% of D1 receptors in younger adults. Results: An age-related reduction in SWM performance was observed, and fMRI data revealed that, relative to younger adults under placebo conditions, elderly persons under-recruited load-sensitive fronto-parietal regions during SWM. Critically, in younger adults, the D1 antagonist resulted in a similar reduction in SWM performance and fMRI response. Conclusions: These results suggest that depletion of dopa mine, whether ontogenetically or pharmacologically, results in decreased SWM performance as well as reduced load-dependent modulation of the blood oxygen level dependent signal in fronto-parietal regions, possibly by decreasing the signal-to-noise ratio in relevant neural networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据