4.7 Article

Physiological Responses to Brain Stimulation During Limbic Surgery: Further Evidence of Anterior Cingulate Modulation of Autonomic Arousal

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 66, 期 7, 页码 695-701

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.05.009

关键词

Anterior cingulotomy; autonomic nervous system; cingulate cortex; electrodermal activity; subcauclate tractotomy

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. National Association for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD)
  3. CePhalon
  4. Cyheronics
  5. Medtronic
  6. Northstar Neuroscience
  7. Pfizer
  8. Forest

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: In view of conflicting neuroimaging results regarding autonomic-specific activity within the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), we investigated autonomic responses to direct brain stimulation during sterecitactic limbic surgery. Methods: Skin conductance activity and accelerative heart rate responses to multi-voltage stimulation of the ACC (n = 7) and paralimbic subcauclate (n = 5) regions were recorded during bilateral anterior cingulotomy and bilateral subcauclate tractotomy (in patients that had previously received an adequate lesion in the ACC), respectively. Results: Stimulations in both groups were accompanied by increased autonomic arousal. Skin conductance activity was significantly increased during ACC stimulations compared with paralimbic targets at 2 V (2.34 +/- .68 [score in microSiemens +/- SE] vs. .34 +/- .09, p = .013) and 3 V (3.52 +/- .86 vs. 1.12 +/- .37, p = .036), exhibiting a strong voltage-response relationship between stimulus magnitude and response amplitude (difference from 1 to 3 V = 1.15 +/- .90 vs. 3.52 +/- .86, p = .041). Heart rate response was less indicative of between-group differences. Conclusions: This is the first study of its kind aiming at seeking novel insights into the mechanisms responsible for central autonomic modulation. It supports a concept that interregional interactions account for the coordination of autonomic arousal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据