4.5 Article

Dexamethasone induces pregnane X receptor and retinoid X receptor-α expression in human hepatocytes:: Synergistic increase of CYP3A4 induction by pregnane X receptor activators

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 361-372

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.58.2.361

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this report we show that submicromolar concentrations of dexamethasone enhance pregnane X receptor (PXR) activator-mediated CYP3A4 gene expression in cultured human hepatocytes. Because this result is only observed after 24 h of cotreatment and is inhibited by pretreatment with cycloheximide, we further investigated which factor(s), induced by dexamethasone, might be responsible for this effect. We report that dexamethasone increases both retinoid X receptor-alpha (RXR alpha) and PXR mRNA expression in cultured human hepatocytes, whereas PXR activators such as rifampicin and clotrimazole do not. Accumulation of RXR alpha and PXR mRNA reaches a maximum at a concentration of 100 nM dexamethasone after treatment for 6 to 12 h and is greatly diminished by RU486. A similar pattern of expression is observed with tyrosine aminotransferase mRNA. Moreover, the effect of dexamethasone on PXR mRNA accumulation seems to be through direct action on the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) because the addition of cycloheximide has no effect, and dexamethasone does not affect the degradation of PXR mRNA. Furthermore, dexamethasone induces the accumulation of a RXR alpha-immunoreactive protein and increases the nuclear level of RXR alpha:PXR heterodimer as shown by gel shift assays with a CYP3A4 ER6 PXRE probe. This accumulation of latent PXR and RXR alpha in the nucleus of hepatocytes explains the synergistic effect observed with dexamethasone and PXR activators together on CYP3A4 induction. These results reveal the existence of functional cross talk between the GR and PXR, and may explain some controversial aspects of the role of the GR in CYP3A4 induction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据