4.6 Article

Sequential and morphological analyses of aberrant crypt foci formation in mice of differing susceptibility to azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 21, 期 8, 页码 1567-1572

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/21.8.1567

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA81428-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK49805-01] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [1T32ES07163] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant crypt foci (ACF), putative preneoplastic lesions, are early morphological changes induced by the colon carcinogen azoxymethane (AOM), Although inbred mice differ markedly in their susceptibility to AOM carcinogenesis, we have previously shown that ACF develop in both resistant and sensitive mouse strains after AOM treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine the sequential development and identify the morphological characteristics of ACF induced by AOM in the distal colon of sensitive and resistant mice. A/J (highly susceptible), SWR/J (relatively susceptible) and AKR/J (resistant) mice were treated with 10 mg/kg AOM or saline i.p. once a week for 6 weeks and were killed at 1, 2, 4, 6, 9 and 24 weeks after the last injection. The distal colons were stained with methylene blue and the numbers of ACF and tumors determined. Tumors were present as early as 4 weeks after AOM exposure in SWR/J and A/J mice and increased in frequency throughout the study in both strains. No tumors developed in the AKR/J mice. ACF, however, formed in all strains of mice. The greatest difference between susceptible and resistant strains was in the number of large ACF that developed at later time points. Furthermore, morphometric analysis revealed that A/J mice had the highest percentage of dysplastic ACF, followed by SWR/J mice. These data indicate that the difference in cancer risk from AOM may be due to the lack of progression of smaller ACF in the resistant mice and to the development of dysplasia in a higher percentage of ACF from susceptible strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据