4.7 Article

Measuring apoptosis in human spermatozoa: a biological assay for semen quality?

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 74, 期 2, 页码 245-250

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00623-3

关键词

annexin V assay; apoptosis; male factor infertility; spermatozoa; TUNEL assay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: [1] To determine whether apoptosis can be measured in ejaculated spermatozoa by flow cytometry using the Annexin V assay, which measures expression of phosphatidylserine on the outer leaflet of the cell membrane, or the TUNEL (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP [deoxy-uridine triphosphate] nick end labeling) assay, which measures occurrence of DNA strand breaks and [2] to correlate the outcome with routine semen variables and the hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) test. Design: Pilot study and clinical trial. Setting: Large teaching hospital and fertility center. Patient(s): Men whose semen was studied fur various reasons. Main Outcome Measure(s): Percentage of apoptotic spermatozoa by two different assays, percentage of necrotic spermatozoa, concentration and motility of spermatozoa, and outcome of the HOS test. Result(s): Apoptosis can be measured in spermatozoa by flow cytometry using the Annexin V assay and the TUNEL assay. Twenty percent of spermatozoa were apoptotic according to both assays. A significant inverse correlation was seen between phosphatidylserine expression (Annexin V assay) and sperm concentration (r = -0.389; P<.05) and motility (r = -0.289; P<.05). A highly significant inverse correlation was seen between DNA double-strand breaks (TUNEL assay) and sperm concentration (r = -0.629; P<.0001). Conclusion(s): Flow cytometry can easily and reliably detect phosphatidylserine expression on the outer leaflet of the cell membrane and DNA strand breaks, both of which are hallmarks of apoptosis. About 20% of ejaculated spermatozoa are apoptotic, and the concentration of spermatozoa is lower in men with more apoptotic spermatozoa. (C) 2000 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据