4.7 Article

Increased Binding of Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptor in Alzheimer's Disease Measured by Positron Emission Tomography with [11C]DAA1106

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 64, 期 10, 页码 835-841

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.04.021

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; microglia; peripheral benzodiazepine receptor; positron emission tomography; [C-11]DAA1106

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japanese Government [16591177]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16591177] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Peripheral benzodiazepine receptor (PBR) in the brain of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients has been discussed in relation to the role of gliosis in AD. The PBR was shown to have the ability to reflect activated glial cells, including microglia. The role of activated microglia in AD is all important topic in the pathophysiology of AD. The aim of this study was to quantify PBR in AD brain with a new high-sensitive PBR ligand, [C-11]DAA1106. Methods: Positron emission tomography (PET) scans with [C-11]DAA1106, a potent and selective ligand for PBR, were performed on 10 patients with AD and 10 age-matched control subjects. All patients had mild to moderate dementia. Duration of illness was 1-3 years at the time of the scans. The PBR binding in the regions of interest was quantified by binding potential (BP) obtained from compartmental model analysis with plasma input function. Results: Mean BP was increased in the brain of AD patients compared with control subjects in all measured regions. Statistical significance reached across many of the regions examined, including dorsal and medial prefrontal cortex, lateral temporal cortex, parietal cortex, occipital cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, striatum, and cerebellum. Conclusions: The broad increase of PBR binding measured with [C-11]DAA1106 in the brain of AD patients suggests a widespread existence of cellular reactions with PBR in relatively early-stage AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据