4.7 Article

Set-Shifting Ability and Schizophrenia: A Marker of Clinical Illness or an Intermediate Phenotype?

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 64, 期 9, 页码 782-788

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.009

关键词

CANTAB; cognition; executive function; intermediate phenotype; schizophrenia; set-shifting; working memory

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 MH002712-13] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Impairments of executive functioning, such as set-shifting ability, are seen as core deficits of schizophrenia and are of interest as candidate intermediate phenotype markers. The lntradimensional/Extradimensional (ID/ED) shift task offers a differentiated assessment of shifting from previously reinforced stimuli as well as shifting from previously reinforced features and has proven to be sensitive to the impairment seen in patients with schizophrenia. Methods: We examined ID/ED performance in 147 patients with schizophrenia, 131 of their healthy siblings, and 303 healthy control subjects. Participants were recruited from local and national sources as volunteers for the Clinical Brain Disorders Branch/National Institute of Mental Health sibling study. Results: Nearly all control subjects (87%) finished the task successfully, as did 80% of siblings. In contrast only 54% of patients with schizophrenia were able to complete the task. Despite the apparent similarity of performance across the sibling and healthy comparison group, the two groups differed significantly in terms of the number of stages until failure. This difference, however, was not present at any particular stage or any other measure of performance. Conclusions: Patients demonstrated robust ID/ED deficits. However, their siblings were minimally impaired, and this impairment did not seem to run in families. These results suggest that impairments on attentional set shifting assessed by ID/ED task are strongly associated with clinical illness, but these impairments are not a promising intermediate phenotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据