4.2 Article

The relative contributions of host density and genetic diversity on prevalence of a multi-host parasite in bumblebees

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 125, 期 4, 页码 900-910

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/biolinnean/bly151

关键词

Bombus; colony density; Crithidia; host-parasite interaction; host diversity; intensity of infection; multiple infections; microsatellite

资金

  1. Bauerstiftung zur Forderung von Wissenschaft und Forschung [FKZ: T 237/18922/2009/kg]
  2. UK Aid from the UK Government
  3. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida)
  4. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC)
  5. Kenyan Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of population and demographic factors in influencing the transmission and establishment parasites infecting multiple hosts is poorly understood. We assessed the effects of these factors on parasite prevalence in a model system - the intestinal protozoan Crithidia bombi (Trypanosomatidae) infecting a range of bumblebee species (Bombus spp.). We used microsatellite markers and sibship reconstruction to infer genetic diversity and the density of host populations to infer their relative contributions to parasite prevalence. We established the prevalence, type (single-vs. multiple-strain infection) and intensity of C. bombi infections in workers and males of three common bumblebee species (B. terrestris, B. lapidarius and B. pascuorum) at 30 locations across Germany. We found evidence that colony density promoted prevalence, while increased genetic diversity lowered prevalence in B. terrestris. The effect size for genetic diversity was much larger than for colony density. Thus, genetic factors affected the prevalence, while demographic and life-history traits (e.g. population density and seasonal cycle of development) were additional factors shaping the spread and establishment of a multi-host parasite. Bombus lapidarius possessed characteristics that indicate it might act as a reservoir species spreading disease to other species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据