4.8 Article

Lipophosphoglycan is a virulence factor distinct from related glycoconjugates in the protozoan parasite leishmania major

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.160257897

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protozoan parasites of the genus Leishmania undergo a complex life cycle involving transmission by biting sand flies and replication within mammalian macrophage phagolysosomes. A major component of the Leishmania surface coat is the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored polysaccharide called lipophosphoglycan (LPG). LPG has been proposed to play many roles in the infectious cycle, including protection against complement and oxidants, serving as the major ligand for macrophage adhesion, and as a key factor mitigating host responses by deactivation of macrophage signaling pathways. However, all structural domains of LPG are shared by other major surface or secretory products, providing a biochemical redundancy that compromises the ability of in vitro tests to establish whether LPG itself is a virulence factor. To study truly Ipg(-) parasites, we generated Leishmania major lacking the gene LPG1 [encoding a putative galactofuranosyl (Gal(f)) transferase] by targeted gene disruption. The lpg1(-) parasites lacked LPG but contained normal levels of related glycoconjugates and GPI-anchored proteins. Infections of susceptible mice and macrophages in vitro showed that these lpg(-) Leishmania were highly attenuated. Significantly and in contrast to previous LPG mutants, reintroduction of LPG1 into the lpg(-) parasites restored virulence. Thus, genetic approaches allow dissection of the roles of this complex family of interrelated parasite virulence factors, and definitively establish the role of LPG itself as a parasite virulence factor. Because the lpg1(-) mutant continue to synthesize bulk GPI-anchored Gal(f)-containing glycolipids other than LPG, a second pathway distinct from the Golgi-associated LPG synthetic compartment must exist.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据