4.8 Article

Natural history of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: Estrogen receptors' status in the tumor is the strongest prognostic factor for survival

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 233-238

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2000.9603

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical course in hepatocellular carcinoma may be very different. We prospectively evaluated 96 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma unsuitable For radical therapy to investigate Factors that could influence survival. Clinical, pathologic, and molecular data of patients were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. The overall actuarial probability of survival at year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 was 72%, 41%, 38%, 24%, 20%, and 9%. At univariate analysis, alphafetoprotein (AFP) (P = .0082); alkaline phosphatase (P = .0281); bilirubin (P = .0076); etiology (P = .0001); increment of turner mass at month 3 (P = .0051); type of estrogen receptor (ER) in the tumor (P = .0000); prothrombin time (P = .0003); and portal vein thrombosis (P = .0000) had prognostic significance. At multivariate analysis, only type of ER (P = .0000) and bilirubin (P = .0030) showed independent predictive value for mortality. Survival was significantly longer in patients with wild-type estrogen receptors (P = .0000). Cumulative probability of survival at year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 was 94%, 66%, 52%, 43%, 35%, and 18% for wild-type and 51%, 21%, 16%, and 9% for variant estrogen receptors (no patients alive after 4 years). Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients with variant ERs had a median survival of 8 months versus 45 months in antihepatitis C virus-positive patients with wild-type ERs (P = .0001). In conclusion, (1) the presence of variant liver ER transcripts in the tumor was the strongest negative predictor of survival in inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma; (2) their presence was associated with spontaneous survival significantly worse than in patients with wild-type estrogen receptors; and (3) HBsAg-positive patients with variant receptors were characterized by the worst survival.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据