4.2 Article

Climatic oscillations shape the phylogeographical structure of Atlantic Forest fire-eye antbirds (Aves: Thamnophilidae)

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 105, 期 4, 页码 900-924

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01823.x

关键词

neotropics; Pyriglena; refuges; rivers

资金

  1. CNPq-Brazil
  2. US National Science Foundation [OISE-0555482]
  3. Whitney R. Harris World Ecology Center at University of Missouri - St Louis, University of Missouri - St Louis Department of Biology
  4. American Museum of Natural History
  5. St Louis Audubon Society
  6. Sigma Xi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, mitochondrial (mt)DNA sequence data were used to examine the genetic structure of fire-eye antbirds (genus Pyriglena) along the Atlantic Forest and the predictions derived from the river hypothesis and from a Last Glacial Maximum Pleistocene refuge paleomodel were compared to explain the patterns of genetic variation observed in these populations. A total of 266 individuals from 45 populations were sampled over a latitudinal transect and a number of phylogeographical and population genetics analytical approaches were employed to address these questions. The pattern of mtDNA variation observed in fire-eye antbirds provides little support for the view that populations were isolated by the modern course of major Atlantic Forest rivers. Instead, the data provide stronger support for the predictions of the refuge model. These results add to the mounting evidence that climatic oscillations appear to have played a substantial role in shaping the phylogeographical structure and possibly the diversification of many taxa in this region. However, the results also illustrate the potential for more complex climatic history and historical changes in the geographical distribution of Atlantic Forest than envisioned by the refuge model. (c) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 105, 900824.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据