4.2 Review

Floral shape mimicry and variation in sexually deceptive orchids with a shared pollinator

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 106, 期 3, 页码 469-481

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2012.01902.x

关键词

deception; geometric morphometrics; Ichneumonidae; learning; Orchidaceae; plant-animal interactions; pollination

资金

  1. Furniss Foundation/American Orchid Society
  2. Macquarie University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mimics can have both accurate mimicry and phenotypic variation if deception operates in multiple sensory modes. Australian Tongue orchids (Cryptostylis species) attract their sole pollinator, male Lissopimpla excelsa wasps (Ichneumonidae), by accurately mimicking the scent and colour of female L. excelsa wasps. To test for shape mimicry of female wasps, both traditional and geometric morphometric comparisons were performed with allopatric Cryptostylis ovata and the often sympatric Cryptostylis erecta, Cryptostylis leptochila, and Cryptostylis subulata. Although some floral parts accurately mimicked the female wasp, the overall floral shape differed dramatically among orchid species. The function (if any) of this interspecific shape variation is unknown, although it does not cause character displacement of pollen attachment locations to reduce interspecific pollen transfer. Analyses showed that floral parts involved in pollinia transfer were similarly shaped for three of the four Cryptostylis species and all attach their pollinia to the same location on the pollinator's abdomen. Shape may interact with pollinator behaviour: in the field, pollination rates doubled when two Cryptostylis species were present, regardless of orchid abundances. Perhaps variation in shape hinders pollinator recognition and the avoidance of orchids, similar to scent and colour variation in other sexually deceptive orchid systems. (C) 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 106, 469481.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据