4.2 Article

Effect of oceanographic barriers and overfishing on the population genetic structure of the European spiny lobster (Palinurus elephas)

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 104, 期 2, 页码 407-418

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01728.x

关键词

Bayesian; coalescence; DAPC; diversity; long-lived species; microsatellites; phyllosoma; phylogeography

资金

  1. Autonomous Government of Catalonia [2006FIC-00082]
  2. FBBVA-BIOCON [08-187/09]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009SGR-636, 2009SGR-655, 2009SGR-1364]
  4. EU [GB-TAF-4474]
  5. [CGL2006-13423]
  6. [CTM2007-66635]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defining population structure and genetic diversity levels is of the utmost importance for developing efficient conservation strategies. Overfishing has caused mean annual catches of the European spiny lobster (Palinurus elephas) to decrease alarmingly along its distribution area. In this context, there is a need for comprehensive studies aiming to evaluate the genetic health of the exploited populations. The present study is based on a set of ten nuclear markers amplified in 331 individuals from ten different localities covering most of P. elephas distribution area. Samples from Atlantic and Mediterranean basins showed small but significant differences, indicating that P. elephas populations do not behave as a single panmictic unit but form two partially-overlapping groups. Despite intense overfishing, our dataset did not recover a recent bottleneck signal, and instead showed a large and stable historical effective size. This result could be accounted for by specific life-history traits (reproduction and longevity) and the limitations of molecular markers in covering recent timescales for nontemporal samples. The findings of the present study emphasize the need to integrate information on effective population sizes and life-history parameters when evaluating population connectivity levels from genetic data. (C) 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 104, 407-418.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据