4.7 Article

Kinematics, kinetic temperatures, and column densities of NH3 in the Orion Hot Core

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 538, 期 2, 页码 665-674

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/309181

关键词

ISM : clouds; ISM : individual (Orion); ISM : molecules; radio lines : ISM; stars : formation; stars : pre-main-sequence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using the VLA, we have mapped the Orion Hot Core region (full extent 10 ) with an angular resolution of similar to 1 in the (J, K)=(4,4) and (10, 9) inversion transitions of (NH3)-N-14 and an angular resolution of 4 in the (J, K) = (2, 2) and (3, 3) inversion transitions of (NH3)-N-15. All of the single-dish flux density for the (10, 9) transition was recovered by the VLA, but a substantial fraction of the flux density in the (4, 4) and (NH3)-N-15 (3, 3) lines was not detected. The missing flux density is from the spatially extended spike component. Assuming that local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) holds, we have calculated the optical depths of the (4, 4) inversion transition for all positions where the main and satellite lines were detected with sufficient signal-to-noise ratio. We combined our (10, 9) data with these (4, 4) line results to produce images of the rotational temperature, T-rot, and the column density of ammonia, N(NH3). For the H-2 densities in the Hot Core, T-rot = T-kin, the kinetic temperature. An additional determination of T-kin and N(NH3) was made by combining our (10, 9) inversion line data with our (NH3)-N-15 (3, 3) inversion line results. The (NH3)-N-15 inversion transitions have no quadrupole hyperfine structure so that the line shapes are simpler. The moment distribution of the (NH3)-N-15 (3, 3) line shows that the largest intensity-weighted line width arises close to the center of the Hot Core region. Thus, we may have discovered a low-luminosity outflow source embedded in the Hot Core. Alternatively, this may be a result of gas motions related to source I, which is about half a beamwidth from this feature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据