4.2 Article

Isolation and high genetic diversity in dwarf mountain toads (Capensibufo) from South Africa

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 100, 期 4, 页码 822-834

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01469.x

关键词

Africa; amphibian dispersal; Cape Fold Mountains; Cape Peninsula; climate change

资金

  1. WWF Table Mountain Fund
  2. Iziko South African Museum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional models of amphibian dispersal and gene flow point to low dispersal and high philopatry. In recent years, this traditional view has been challenged and it appears that no general model holds across taxa. Conservation of amphibians cannot be addressed on an over-arching scale, but must come on a case-by-case basis, especially for range-restricted species where information on gene flow and migration must be incorporated into conservation efforts. The only two members of the genus Capensibufo Grandison, 1980 (Anura: Bufonidae) are range restricted small bufonids, with distributions limited to montane areas in South Africa. Using a Bayesian analysis of two mitochondrial markers (16S and ND2), we examined the genetic patterns in Capensibufo rosei and Capensibufo tradouwi in order to understand both taxonomic and geographic boundaries. These species were not monophyletic, and demonstrate no clear taxonomic boundaries. Instead, the genus is extremely diverse genetically, with distinct lineages confined to isolated mountains that represent geographic boundaries. In addition, bioclimatic modelling using MAXENT and scenarios of climatic conditions at both the present and last glacial maximum suggest multiple bioclimatic and physical barriers to gene flow at present and in the past. We conclude that members of the genus have very low vagility, that current taxonomic boundaries are inadequate, and that strong geographic structuring has undoubtedly contributed to genetic diversity at the species level, rather than the population level. (C) 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 100, 822-834.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据