4.2 Article

Identification of ecophenotypic trends within three European freshwater mussel species (Bivalvia: Unionoida) using traditional and modern morphometric techniques

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 98, 期 4, 页码 814-825

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01329.x

关键词

fourier shape analysis; intraspecific variability; palaeontological reconstruction; Unionidae

资金

  1. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most species of freshwater mussels (Unionoida) show a wide variability in shell form and size but an understanding of which factors determine unionoid morphology is poor. We identified ecophenotypic trends in shell and internal characters within three unionoid species from two habitat types (marinas and river) of the River Thames, UK, using traditional and modern morphometric techniques. In marinas, all species grew to larger maximum sizes than in the river, which might be a result of higher temperatures and phytoplankton densities in marinas. Unio pictorum in marinas was more elongated than in the river and Fourier shape analysis revealed a trend from dorsally arched river specimens to straight dorsal and pointed posterior margins in marina individuals. The degree of shell elongation and shape of dorso-posterior margin were not associated with sediment composition, but were associated with the different hydrological characters of the two habitat types. Relative shell width was a poor indicator of collection site and influenced by allometric growth. Unlike U. pictorum, a difference in shell elongation of marina and river mussels could not be detected in Unio tumidus and Anodonta anatina. However, all three species showed the same trends regarding the shape of the dorso-posterior shell margin. This shell character may thus have broad ecological significance and could have considerable utility to palaeontologists, taxonomists, and conservation biologists. (C) 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 98, 814-825.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据