4.2 Article

Life history evolution in a globally invading tephritid: patterns of survival and reproduction in medflies from six world regions

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 97, 期 1, 页码 106-117

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01178.x

关键词

adaptation; biological invasion; Ceratitis capitata; geographic variation; life history traits; Tephritidae

资金

  1. National Institute on Ageing [P01-AG022500-01, P01-AG08761-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Comparisons among populations from different localities represent an important tool in the study of evolution. Medflies have colonized many temperate and tropical areas all over the world during the last few centuries. In a common garden environment, we examined whether medfly populations obtained from six global regions [Africa (Kenya), Pacific (Hawaii), Central America (Guatemala), South America (Brazil), Extra-Mediterranean (Portugal) and Mediterranean (Greece)] have evolved different survival and reproductive schedules. Whereas females were either short-lived [life expectancy at eclosion (e(0)) 48-58 days; Kenya, Hawaii and Guatemala] or long-lived (e(0) 72-76 days; Greece, Portugal and Brazil], males with one exception (Guatemala) were generally long-lived (e(0) 106-122 days). Although males universally outlived females in all populations, the longevity gender gap was highly variable (20-58 days). Lifetime fecundity rates were similar among populations. However, large differences were observed in their age-specific reproductive patterns. Short-lived populations mature at earlier ages and allocate more of their resources to reproduction early in life compared with long-lived ones. In all populations, females experienced a post-reproductive lifespan, with this segment being significantly longer in Kenyan flies. Therefore, it seems plausible that medfly populations, inhabiting ecologically diverse habitats, have evolved different life history strategies to cope with local environmental conditions. (C) 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 97, 106-117.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据