4.2 Article

Limited male dispersal in a social spider with extreme inbreeding

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 97, 期 2, 页码 227-234

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01190.x

关键词

breeding system; gene flow; matrilineages; movement; sex ratio

资金

  1. Danish Research Council [21-01-0412]
  2. Marie Curie Fellowship [FP6 MEIF-CT-2006-023645]
  3. US-Israel Binational Science Foundation [BSF 2006353]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cooperatively breeding animals commonly avoid incestuous mating through pre-mating dispersal. However, a few group-living organisms, including the social spiders, have low pre-mating dispersal, intra-colony mating, and inbreeding. This results in limited gene flow among colonies and sub-structured populations. The social spiders also exhibit female-biased sex ratios because survival benefits to large colonies favour high group productivity, which selects against 1 : 1 sex ratios. Although propagule dispersal of mated females may occasionally bring about limited gene flow, little is known about the role of male dispersal. We assessed the extent of male movement between colonies in natural populations both experimentally and by studying colony sex ratios over the mating season. We show that males frequently move to neighbouring colonies, whereas only 4% of incipient nests were visited by dispersing males. Neighbouring colonies are genetically similar and movement within colony clusters does not contribute to gene flow. Post-mating sex ratio bias was high early in the mating season due to protandry, and also in colonies at the end of the season, suggesting that males remain in the colony when mated females have dispersed. Thus, male dispersal is unlikely to facilitate gene flow between different matrilineages. This is consistent with models of non-Fisherian group-level selection for the maintenance of female biased sex ratios, which predict the elimination of male dispersal. (C) 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2009, 97, 227-234.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据