4.5 Article

Metabolic and cognitive response to human traumatic brain injury: A quantitative proton magnetic resonance study

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 629-640

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PUBL
DOI: 10.1089/089771500415382

关键词

inflammation; N-acetylaspartate; neurochemistry; neuropsychological testing; proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35708, NS39123] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) offers a unique insight into brain cellular metabolism following traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of the present study was to assess change in neurometabolite markers of brain injury during the recovery period following TBI. We studied 19 TBI patients at 1.5, 3, and 6 months postinjury and 28 controls. We used H-1-MRS to quantify N-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine (Cre), choline (Cho), and myoinositol (mIns) in occipitoparietal gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) remote from the primary injury focus. Neuropsychological testing quantified cognitive impairment and recovery. At 1.5 months, we found cognitive impairment (mean z score = -1.36 vs. 0.18,p < 0.01), lower NAA (GM: 12.42 mM vs. 13.03, p = 0.01; WM: 11.75 vs. 12.81, p < 0.01), and elevated Cho (GM: 1.51 vs. 1.25, p < 0.01; WM: 1.98 vs. 1.79, p < 0.01) in TBI patients compared with controls. GM NAA at 1.5 months predicted cognitive function at outcome (6 months postinjury; r = 0.63, p = 0.04). GM NAA continued to fall by 0.46 mM between 1.5 and 3 months (p = 0.02) indicating continuing neuronal loss, metabolic dysfunction, off both. Between 3 and 6 months, WM NAA increased by 0.55 mM (p = 0.06) suggesting metabolic recovery. Patients with poorer outcomes had elevated mean GM Cho at 3 months postinjury, suggesting active inflammation, as compared to patients with better outcomes (p = 0.002). H-1-MRS offers a noninvasive approach to assessing neuronal injury and inflammation following TBI, and may provide unique data for patient management and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据