4.2 Article

The impact of redefined species limits in Palame (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae: Acanthocinini) on assessments of host, seasonal, and stratum specificity

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 76, 期 2, 页码 195-209

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02082.x

关键词

canopy; COI sequence divergence; Eschweilera coriacea; host specificity; host race; insect seasonality; Lecythis poiteaui; mtDNA; plant-insect interactions; tropical insects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assumptions about the host and stratum specificity of tropical insects are routinely incorporated into estimates of global species richness, but few empirical studies reliably assess tropical insect specificity. In French Guiana, cerambycid beetles in the genus Palame reproduce exclusively in trees belonging to the Brazil nut family (Lecythidaceae). During a year-long rearing project, Palame anceps (Bates) emerged exclusively from a single host species, but P. crassimana Bates and P. mimetica Monne appeared to make seasonal changes in host affiliation. In the case of P. crassimana, dry season specimens could be distinguished from rainy season specimens by subtle differences in pubescence, but it was difficult to find diagnostic morphological characters supporting their delimitation as separate species. In order to detect genetic differentiation in Palame, 1049 bp of mitochondrial DNA (COI gene) were sequenced. The three nominal species of Palame yielded six haplotype groups, with sequence divergences among groups ranging from 8.27 to 17.56%. Species with apparent seasonal changes in host use included multiple distinct haplotype groups that I interpret to represent multiple species-level taxa. Insects considered generalized owing to temporal or geographical changes in host association may, with improved resolution in species limits, prove to be assemblages including relatively specialized cryptic species. (C) 2002 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2002, 76, 195-209.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据