4.2 Article

Evolution of morphological adaptations for digging in living and extinct ctenomyid and octodontid rodents

期刊

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 267-283

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01057.x

关键词

behaviour; Ctenomyidae; evolutionary morphology; Octodontidae; subterranean niche

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata [PIP2005 5838]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT2002 01-12507, PICTO2004 1-423]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To examine the evolution of burrowing specializations in the sister families Octodontidae and Ctenomyidae (Rodentia: Caviomorpha), we produced a synthetic phylogeny (supertree), combining both molecular and morphological phylogenies, and including both fossil and extant genera. We mapped morphological specializations of the digging apparatus onto our phylogenetic hypothesis and attempted to match morphological diversity with information on the ecology and behaviour of octodontoid taxa. Burrowing for sheltering and rearing is the rule among octodontids and ctenomyids, and adaptations for digging have been known from the Early Pliocene onward. However, only a few taxa have evolved fully subterranean habits. Scratch-digging is widespread among both semifossorial and fully subterranean lineages, and morphological changes associated with scratch-digging are not restricted to subterranean lineages. By contrast, various adaptations for chisel-tooth digging are restricted to some subterranean lineages and are combined differently in the octodontid Spalacopus, the fossil ctenomyid Eucelophorus, and some living Ctenomys. Some octodontid taxa are able to dig complex burrows in spite of having no substantial changes in musculoskeletal attributes. Hence, we suggest that, during the early evolution of those branches giving rise to fully subterranean ctenomyids and octodontids, a change in behaviour probably preceded the origin of structural adaptations. (C) 2008 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2008, 95, 267-283.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据