4.4 Article

Latitudinal trends in growth, reproduction and defense of an invasive plant

期刊

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 189-201

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-018-1816-y

关键词

Environmental heterogeneity; Latitudinal gradient; Biotic pressures; Phytolacca americana; Plant invasion; Temperature and Precipitation

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFC1200100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31470447]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [Y329351H03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invasive plants often occupy an array of habitats along wide latitudinal scales which differ considerably in climatic conditions and herbivory. Variation in plant traits across latitude may play an important role in invasion success, yet few studies have tested whether there is a latitudinal pattern in invasive plant traits. Here, we sampled individuals of the invasive plant Phytolacca americana at 15 field sites spanning 10 degrees of latitude from 25.72 degrees to 36.15 degrees N in central and southern China. We measured traits related to growth (plant height, canopy width, number of branches and stem diameter), reproduction (fruits per raceme and racemes per plant) and anti-herbivory defense (leaf, stem, root and fruit saponin). Overall, we found no latitudinal patterns for plant size, reproductive output or defense in growth tissues. However, growth architecture was significantly related to latitude: number of stems increased, while stem diameter decreased with increasing latitude. Reproductive architecture was also significantly related to latitude: with increasing latitude, plants produced fewer fruits per raceme, but more racemes per plant. We also found defense in reproductive tissue (fruit saponin) increased with increasing latitude. These findings provide an important latitudinal perspective for resource allocation and adaptive strategy in invasive P. americana that may aid in management recommendations at regional scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据