4.8 Article

Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 343, 期 6, 页码 378-384

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200008103430601

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Small studies show that many children born as extremely preterm infants have logic and developmental disabilities. We evaluated all children who were born at 25 or fewer completed weeks of gestation in the United Kingdom and Ireland from March through December 1995 at the time when they reached a median age of 30 months. Methods Each child underwent a formal ment by an independent examiner. Development was evaluated with use of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, and neurologic function was assessed by a standardized examination. Disability and severe were defined by predetermined criteria. Results At a median age of 30 months, corrected for gestational age, 283 (92 percent) of the 308 surviving children were formally assessed. The mean (+/- SD) scores on the Bayley Mental and Psychomotor Developmental Indexes, referenced to a population mean of 100, were 84 +/- 12 and 87 +/- 13, respectively. Fifty-three children (19 percent) had severely delayed development (with scores more than 3 SD below the mean), and a further 32 children (11 percent) had scores from 2 SD to 3 SD below the mean. eight children (10 percent) had severe neuromotor disability, 7 (2 percent) were blind or perceived light only, and 8 (3 percent) had hearing loss that was uncorrectable or required hearing aids. Overall, 138 children had disability (49 percent; 95 percent confidence 43 to 55 percent), including 64 who met the criteria for severe disability (23 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 18 to 28 percent). When data from 17 assessments by local pediatricians were included, 155 of the 314 infants discharged (49 percent) had no disability. Conclusions Severe disability is common among children born as extremely preterm infants and remains a major challenge in this group of children. (N Engl J Med 2000; 343:378-84.) (C) 2000, Massachusetts Medical Society.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据