4.6 Article

Sensitization to death receptor cytotoxicity by inhibition of Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD)/caspase signaling -: Requirement of cell cycle progression

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 32, 页码 24670-24678

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M003280200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Upon binding of their ligands, death receptors belonging to the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family initiate a signaling pathway leading to the activation of caspases and ultimately apoptosis, TNF, however, in parallel elicits survival signals, protecting many cell types from cell death that can only be induced by combined treatment with TNF and inhibitors of protein synthesis. Here, we report that in NIH3T3 cells, apoptosis in response TNF and cycloheximide is not inhibited by the broad spectrum caspase inhibitor benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethyl ketone (zVAD.fmk). Moreover, treatment with zVAD.fmk sensitizes the cells to the cytotoxic action of TNF, Sensitization was also achieved by overexpression of a dominant-negative mutant of Fas-associated death domain protein and, to a lesser-extent, by specific inhibition of caspase-8. A similar, but weaker sensitization of zVAD.fmk to treatment with the TNF-related apoptosis-inducing Ligand (TRAIL) or anti-CD95 antibody was demonstrated. The unexpected cell death in response to TNF and caspase inhibition occurs despite the activation of nuclear factor kappa B and c-Jun N-terminal kinases. The mode of cell death shows several signs of apoptosis including DNA fragmentation, although activation of caspase-3 was excluded. TNF/zVAD.fmk-induced cell death is preceded by an accumulation of cells in the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle, indicating an important role of cell cycle progression. This hypothesis is further strengthened by the observation that arresting the cells in the G(1) phase of the cell cycle inhibited TNF/zVAD.fmk-induced cell death, whereas blocking them in the G(2)/M phase augmented it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据