4.5 Article

Copper-dependent trafficking of Wilson disease mutant ATP7B proteins

期刊

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
卷 9, 期 13, 页码 1927-1935

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/9.13.1927

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously developed a functional assay in yeast for the copper transporter, ATP7B, defective in Wilson disease (WND). Analysis of WND variant ATP7B proteins revealed that several were able to completely, or nearly completely, complement a mutant yeast strain in which the ATP7B ortholog CCC2 was disrupted, indicating that these ATP7B proteins retained copper transport activity. We analyzed the intracellular localization of these active WND ATP7B variant proteins using transient transfection of Chinese hamster ovary cells and triple-label immunofluorescence microscopy, as a second possible aspect of defective function. Two ATP7B variants, Asp765Asn and Leu776Val, which have normal copper transport activity in yeast, retained partial normal Golgi network localization, but were predominantly mislocalized throughout the cell. Asp765Asn and Leu776Val proteins were capable of only partial copper-dependent redistribution. WND variant protein Arg778Leu, which has defective function in yeast, was extensively mislocalized, presumably to the endoplasmic reticulum. ATP7B variant proteins Gly943Ser, which has nearly normal function in yeast, and CysProCys/Ser (mutation of the conserved CysProCys motif to SerProSer), inactive in yeast, were localized normally but were unable to redistribute in response to copper. Localization data from this study, combined with functional data from our yeast studies, provide a biochemical mechanism that can explain in part the variable biochemical features of WND, in particular the normal holoceruloplasmin levels observed in some patients. Our data have direct implications for WND diagnosis, indicating that decreased serum ceruloplasmin concentration is not likely to be observed with certain genetic variants of WND.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据