4.6 Article

Kinetic and functional characterization of 1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D-arabinitol: A potent inhibitor of glycogen phosphorylase with anti-hyperglyceamic effect in ob/ob mice

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 380, 期 2, 页码 274-284

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1006/abbi.2000.1930

关键词

glycogen phosphorylase; anti-hyperglycaemic; C57BL/6J (ob/ob); glucagon; Type 2 diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of 1,4-dideoxy-1,4-imino-D-arabinitol (DAB) were investigated on preparations of glycogen phosphorylase (GP) and in C57BL6J (ob/ob) mice by C-13 NMR in vivo. Independent of the phosphorylation state or the mammalian species or tissue from which GP was derived, DAB inhibited GP with Ki-values of approximately 400 nM, The mode of inhibition was uncompetitive or noncompetitive, with respect to glycogen and Pi, respectively. The effects of glucose and caffeine on the inhibitory effect of DAB were investigated. Taken together, these data suggest that DAB defines a novel mechanism of action. Intraperitoneal treatment with DAB (a total of 105 mg/kg in seven doses) for 210 min inhibited glucagon-stimulated glycogenolysis in obese and lean mice. Thus, liver glycogen levels were 361 +/- 19 and 228 +/- 19 mu mol glucosyl units/g with DAB plus glucagon in lean and obese mice, respectively, compared to 115 +/- 24 and 37 +/- 8 mu mol glucosyl units/g liver with glucagon only. Moreover, with glucagon only end-point blood glucose levels were at 29 +/- 2 and 17.5 +/- 2 mM in obese and lean mice, respectively, compared to 17.5 +/- 1 and 12 +/- 1 mM with glucagon plus DAB, In conclusion, DAB is a novel and potent inhibitor of GP with an apparently distinct mechanism of action. Further, DAB inhibited the hepatic glycogen breakdown in vivo and displayed an accompanying anti-hyperglycemic effect, which was most pronounced in obese mice. The data suggest that inhibition of GP may offer a therapeutic principle in Type 2 diabetes. (C) 2000 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据