4.4 Article

R-domain interactions with distal regions of CFTR lead to phosphorylation and activation

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 32, 页码 9868-9875

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi992807d

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [P50 DK53090] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cystic fibrosis is caused by the aberrant function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein. We examined whether intramolecular binding interactions involving the regulatory (R) domain contributed to CFTR regulation and function. When the R-domain (amino acids 596-836) was coexpressed with Delta 1-836 CFTR (a carboxyl hemi-CFTR beginning immediately after the R-domain), strong binding between the two polypeptides was exhibited. The R-domain that co-immunoprecipitated with Delta 1-836 exhibited a slower mobility on SDS-PAGE that resulted from phosphorylation of the protein. A larger CFTR polypeptide that included the R-domain (M837X) also exhibited a phosphorylation-dependent mobility shift when coexpressed with Delta 1-836. Moreover, coexpression of M837X and Delta 1-836 led to enhanced halide permeability in living cells. The activity, unlike in full-length CFTR, was present without forskolin activation, but still sensitive to the PKA inhibitor, Rp-8-CPT-cAMPS. This PKA inhibition of activity was found to be dependent on the carboxy region of the R-domain, amino acids 723-836. Our results indicate that the R-domain binds CFTR residues after amino acid 836 and that this binding facilitates phosphorylation and CFTR activation. We have also characterized a subdomain within CFTR (residues 723-837) that is necessary for PKA-dependent constitutive activation. Finally, these experiments demonstrate that constitutive CFTR activity can be accomplished by at least two mechanisms: (1) direct modulation of the R-domain to abrogate PKA regulation and (2) modifications that increase R-domain susceptibility to steady-state phosphorylation through PKA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据