4.6 Article

A novel human gene similar to the protein kinase (PK) coding domain of the large subunit of herpes simplex virus type 2 ribonucleotide reductase (ICP10) codes for a serine-threonine PK and is expressed in melanoma cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 275, 期 33, 页码 25690-25699

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M002140200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA75453] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The large subunit of herpes simplex virus type 2 ribonucleotide reductase (ICP10) is a multifunctional protein that contains a serine-threonine protein kinase (PK) activity (Nelson, J. W,, Zhu, J,, Smith, C. C,, Kulka, M., and Aurelian, L. (1996) J, Biol. Chem. 271, 17021-17027). Phylogenetic analyses indicated that ICP10 PK belongs to a distinct subfamily of growth factor receptor serine-threonine PKs that are characterized by their ability to function with a limited number of conserved catalytic motifs (Hunter, J. C. R., Smith, C. C., and Aurelian, L. (1995) Int. J. One. 7, 515-522). Here, we report the isolation and characterization of a novel gene, designated H11, that contains an open reading frame of 588 nucleotides, which encodes a protein similar to ICP10 ph, The H11 protein has Mn2+-dependent serine-threonine-specific PK activity as determined with a GST-H11 fusion protein and by immunocomplex PK immunoblotting assays of 293 cells transfected with a H11 eukaryotic expression vector. PK activity is ablated by mutation of Lys(113) within the presumtive catalytic motif II (invariant Lys), 293 cells stably transfected with H11 acquire anchorage-independent growth. Endogenous H11 RNA and the H11 phosphoprotein are expressed in melanoma cell lines and primary melanoma tissues at levels higher than in normal melanocytes and in benign nevi. Melanoma cell proliferation is inhibited by treatment with antisense oligonucleotides that inhibit H11 translation, suggesting that H11 expression is associated with cell growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据