4.4 Article

Variation of morphometric traits in populations of an invasive carabid predator (Merizodus soledadinus) within a sub-Antarctic island

期刊

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 3405-3417

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9739-2

关键词

Trophic resources; Phenotypic plasticity; Morphometrics; Body size; Biological invasion; Insect; Predator; Gender; Sub-Antarctic islands

资金

  1. Institut Polaire Francais (IPEV) [136]
  2. CNRS (Zone-Atelier de Recherches sur l'Environnement Antarctique et Subantarctique)
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invasive predators may change their own trophic conditions by progressively displacing or reducing diversity and abundance of native prey. As food quality and quantity are two main factors determining adult body size in arthropods, alteration of the available resources may thus affect predators' morphology. The flightless carabid beetle Merizodus soledadinus was accidentally introduced to Iles Kerguelen in a single site in 1913. Its successful spreading process has been monitored over the long term, providing an exceptional research opportunity with multiple snapshots of similar colonized sites mostly differing by the residence time of M. soledadinus. To test if M. soledadinus' morphology is correlated with its residence time in each habitat, we measured nine morphometric traits in five populations. We detected significant morphological differences: individuals from the first colonized site were the smallest, whereas individuals from the most recently colonized site were the largest. Our study also highlighted among-site variation in sexual dimorphism of the last abdominal sternite: its length differed between sites for females, but not for males. We discuss this diminution of M. soledadinus' size in the light of both a priori (development under diet restriction, survival) and a posteriori (intrapopulation competition, cannibalism) effects on growth and development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据