4.4 Article

Secondary invasion of the round goby into high diversity Great Lakes tributaries and species at risk hotspots: potential new concerns for endangered freshwater species

期刊

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 1269-1284

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-009-9545-x

关键词

Endangered species; Neogobius melanostomus; Round goby; Secondary invasion; Great Lakes; Ecological impact; Species at risk; Invasive species

资金

  1. NSERC
  2. OGS
  3. ESRF
  4. SARCEP
  5. Ministry of Natural Resources
  6. University of Guelph
  7. University of Toronto
  8. World Wildlife Fund Canada's Endangered Species Recovery Fund
  9. Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  10. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources
  11. Trent University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) first invaded North America in 1990 when it was discovered in the St. Clair River. Despite more than 15 years of potential invasion, many Great Lakes' lotic systems remained uninvaded. Recently, we captured the round goby from several Great Lakes tributaries known as species-at-risk hotspots. With a combination of field sampling of round gobies and literature review of the impact of round gobies on native taxa, we assess the potential impacts of the secondary invasion to native species using three mechanisms: competition; predation; and indirect impacts from the loss of obligate mussel hosts. We estimate that 89% (17/19) of benthic fishes and 17% (6/36) of mussels that occur in these systems are either known or suspected to be impacted by the secondary invasion of round goby. In particular, we note that the distribution of potential impacts of round goby invasion was largely associated with species with a conservation designation, including seven endangered species (1 fish, 6 mussels). As these recent captures of round goby represent novel occurrences in high diversity watersheds, understanding the potential impacts of secondary invasion to native biota is fundamental to prevent species declines and to allow early mitigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据