期刊
BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
卷 11, 期 6, 页码 1225-1229出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-008-9333-z
关键词
Invasive species; Methodological questions; Motivational subjectivity; Terminology; Objective definitions
资金
- DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
- Hans Sigrist Foundation
Invasions biologists have frequently debated whether the definition of invasive should include ecological and economic impacts. More recent criticisms posit that objective definitions are impossible in any absolute sense, while subjectivity is desirable for its flexibility and motivational qualities. We argue that such criticisms underestimate the extent of subjectivity already present in invasion biology. Ecological questions may be methodological if they relate directly to other ecological theories and models, or motivational if they focus on issues important to society as a whole. Motivational questions are important for engaging scientists, improving public understanding of science, and often have applied benefits. In contrast, methodological questions are constrained by established scientific theories, and are therefore more efficient for the development of scientific knowledge. Contrary to recent critiques, we suggest that greater objectivity is both achievable and desirable for the discipline of invasion biology and ecology generally.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据