4.7 Article

Structure and reactivity of aquacarbonylruthenium(II) complexes. An x-ray and oxygen-17 NMR study

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 39, 期 17, 页码 3816-3822

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ic0002317

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The water exchange on [Ru(CO)(H2O-eq)(4)(H2O-ax)](tos)(2) (1), [Ru(CO)(2)(H2O-eq)(2)(H2O-ax)(2)] (tos)2 (2), and [Ru(CO)(3)(H2O)(3)](ClO4)(2) (3), the O-17 exchange between the bulk water and the carbonyl oxygens have been studied by O-17 NMR spectroscopy, and the X-ray crystallographic structures of 1 and 2 have been determined. The water exchange of equatorially and axially coordinated water molecules on 1 and 2 follow an id mechanism and an characterized by k(eq)(298) (s(-1)), Delta H-double dagger (kJ/mol), and Delta S-double dagger (J/(mol K)) of (2.54 +/- 0.05) x 10(-6), 111.6 +/- 0.4, and 22.4 +/- 1 (1-eq); (3.54 +/- 0.02) x 10(-2) and 81 (1-ax); (1.58 +/- 0.14) x 10(-7), 120.3 +/- 2, and 28.4 +/- 4 (2-eq); and (4.53 +/- 0.05) x 10(-4), 97.9 +/- 1, and 19.3 +/- 3 (2-ax). The observed reactivities correlate with the strength of the Ru-OH2 bonds, as expressed by their length obtained by X-ray studies: 2.079 (1-eq), 2.140 (1-ax), 2.073 (2-eq), and 2.110 (2-ax) Angstrom. 3 is strongly acidic with a pK(a) of -0.14 at 262 K. Therefore, the acid-dependent water exchange can take place through 3 or Ru(CO)(3)(H2O)(3)OH+ with an estimated k(eq)(298) of 10(-4)/10(-5) s(-1) and k(OH)(262) of 0.053 +/- 0.006 s(-1). The O-17 exchange rate between the bulk water and the carbonyl oxygens increases from 1 to 2 to 3. For 1 an upper limit of 10(-8) s(-1) was estimated. For 2, no acid dependence of k(Ru)(CO) between 0.1 and 1 m Htos was observed. At 312.6 K, in 0.1 and 1 m Htos, k(Ru)(CO) = (1.18 +/- 0.03) x 10(-4). For the tricarbonyl complex, the exchange can proceed through 3 or Ru(CO)(3)(H2O)(2)OH+ with k(Ru)(CO) and k(RuOH)(CO) of respectively, 0.003 +/- 0.002 and 0.024 +/- 0.003 s(-1), with a ruthenacarboxylic acid intermediate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据