4.3 Article

The stochastic properties of input spike trains control neuronal arithmetic

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS
卷 106, 期 2, 页码 111-122

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00422-012-0483-9

关键词

Neuronal arithmetic; Probabilistic model; Coincidence detection; Excitatory-excitatory interaction; Excitatory-inhibitory interaction

资金

  1. Institute of Experimental Medicine, ASCR, Prague [GACR P303/12/1347, GACR P304/12/1342, GACR P304/12/G069]
  2. Electronic-Biomedical Cooperation at the College Of Polytechnics, Jihlava [M00176]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the nervous system, the representation of signals is based predominantly on the rate and timing of neuronal discharges. In most everyday tasks, the brain has to carry out a variety of mathematical operations on the discharge patterns. Recent findings show that even single neurons are capable of performing basic arithmetic on the sequences of spikes. However, the interaction of the two spike trains, and thus the resulting arithmetic operation may be influenced by the stochastic properties of the interacting spike trains. If we represent the individual discharges as events of a random point process, then an arithmetical operation is given by the interaction of two point processes. Employing a probabilistic model based on detection of coincidence of random events and complementary computer simulations, we show that the point process statistics control the arithmetical operation being performed and, particularly, that it is possible to switch from subtraction to division solely by changing the distribution of the inter-event intervals of the processes. Consequences of the model for evaluation of binaural information in the auditory brainstem are demonstrated. The results accentuate the importance of the stochastic properties of neuronal discharge patterns for information processing in the brain; further studies related to neuronal arithmetic should therefore consider the statistics of the interacting spike trains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据