4.3 Article

A mixed filter algorithm for cognitive state estimation from simultaneously recorded continuous and binary measures of performance

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS
卷 99, 期 1, 页码 1-14

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00422-008-0227-z

关键词

cognitive state; binary filter; Kalman filter; learning; Gaussian approximation

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA015644, DA 015644] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH071847-04, MH 071847, R01 MH071847, MH 58847, R01 MH058847] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continuous (reaction times) and binary (correct/ incorrect responses) measures of performance are routinely recorded to track the dynamics of a subject's cognitive state during a learning experiment. Current analyses of experimental data from learning studies do not consider the two performance measures together and do not use the concept of the cognitive state formally to design statistical methods. We develop a mixed filter algorithm to estimate the cognitive state modeled as a linear stochastic dynamical system from simultaneously recorded continuous and binary measures of performance. The mixed filter algorithm has the Kalman filter and the more recently developed recursive filtering algorithm for binary processes as special cases. In the analysis of a simulated learning experiment the mixed filter algorithm provided a more accurate and precise estimate of the cognitive state process than either the Kalman or binary filter alone. In the analysis of an actual learning experiment in which a monkey's performance was tracked by its series of reaction times, and correct and incorrect responses, the mixed filter gave a more complete description of the learning process than either the Kalman or binary filter. These results establish the feasibility of estimating cognitive state from simultaneously recorded continuous and binary performance measures and suggest a way to make practical use of concepts from learning theory in the design of statistical methods for the analysis of data from learning experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据