4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Density profiles of Alzheimer disease regional brain pathology for the Huddinge brain bank: pattern recognition emulates and expands upon Braak staging

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 35, 期 6-7, 页码 851-864

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0531-5565(00)00147-9

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; brain pathology; pattern recognition; grade-of membership analysis; fuzzy logic; latent class analysis; neurofibrillary tangles; diffuse plaque; neuritic plaque; dementia

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P20-AG12852-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Density profiles of Alzheimer's disease (AD) regional brain pathology were constructed for 249 subjects in the Huddinge Brain Bank. Counts: per square millimeter for neurofibrillary tangles (NFT), diffuse plaques (DP), and neuritic plaques (NP) in 38 areas were investigated using a pattern recognition technique called GoM. The seven distributional profiles of AD neuropathology emulated and expanded upon Braak staging illustrating induction (Groups 1-3) and clinical progression (Groups 4-7). Normal aging represented limited AD changes, few NFT in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampal CA1 (Group 1). The threshold fur possible AD was NFT in the subiculum (Group 2). found with DP in the neocortex. Temporal medial NFT was the threshold for probable AD (Group 4). The 'oldest-old', often demented without brain atrophy, had extensive entorhinal/CA1 NFT and cortical DP, but few cortical NFT or NP (Group 5). A second subtype 'disconnection' (Group 6) lacked AD pathology for a specific set of subcortical and cortical areas. Accumulation of NFT in first-affected areas continued through end-stage disease (Group 7), with apparent rapid transition of DP to NP in the cortex during clinical progression. The evolution of AD is a highly ordered sequential process. Pattern recognition approaches such as GoM may be useful in better defining the process. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据