4.6 Article

Effect of volatile compounds produced by Bacillus strains on postharvest decay in citrus

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
卷 53, 期 1, 页码 122-128

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.11.010

关键词

Antagonists; Antifungal effects; Bacillus spp.; Volatile compounds; Citrus

资金

  1. National Research Foundation, South Africa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The antifungal effects of volatile compounds produced by Bacillus strains; Bacillus subtilis PPCB001 or Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PPCB004 and antagonist combination (PPCB001 + PPCB004) against Penicillium digitatum Sacc., Penicillium italicum Wehmer and Penicillium crustosum Thom isolates were investigated in vitro and in vivo. The antagonists alone or in combination inhibited the radial mycelial growth of Penicillium spp. in vitro. Among the three Penicillium isolates tested P. crustosum showed 73.3% of mycelial growth inhibition in presence of PPCB004. The antifungal effects of volatiles increased with increasing time (days), and PPCB004 showed the highest inhibition of radial mycelial growth in P. crustosum on the 10th day. The EC50 was 2.5 x 10(5) CFU ml(-1) for PPCB001; 9.45 x 10(6) CFU ml(-1) for PPCB004 and 7.76 x 10(6) CFU ml(-1) for PPCB001 + PPCB004. Antagonist PPCB004 incubated at 37 degrees C for 24 h showed higher inhibitory effect on spore germination and germ tube elongation in P. crustosum than all other treatments. Although, PPCB001 produced a higher number of volatile compounds (21 different types) than PPC004 (8 different types), 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (acetoin) was the predominant ketone produced by both PPCB001 (45.98%) and PPCB004 (97.52%). Antagonist PPCB004 showed significant inhibition on decay incidence and severity in Valencia, inoculated with P. crustosum and held at 25 degrees C for 12 days. The observations indicated that B. amyloliquefaciens PPCB004 to control P. crustosum in postharvest systems. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据