4.6 Article

Biocontrol potential of Trichoderma martiale against the black-pod disease (Phytophthora palmivora) of cacao

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 143-149

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.04.005

关键词

Theobroma cacao; Biological control; Phytophthora palmivora; Antagonistic interaction; Biocontrol formulation; Mass production; Sensitivity to fungicides; Germination and survival

资金

  1. Almirante Cacau Inc. (Itajuipe-BA, Brazil)
  2. Superintendency of the Manaus Free Trade Zone (SUFRAMA, Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Black-Pod Rot of cacao (Theobroma cacao) caused by Phytophthora species is one of the most important diseases affecting this crop worldwide, with average annual losses above 30%. The aim of this work was to assess the potential for the endophytic Trichoderma martiale strain ALF 247 to control Phytophthora palmivora. When ALF 247 was applied at concentrations ranging from 1 x 10(4) to 5 x 10(7) conidia per milliliter, the disease severity decreased proportionally. Addition of vegetable oil and/or sucrose in the formulations did not affect the biocontrol results. Fungicides such as copper hydroxide and fosetyl-Al had no effect on conidial germination of this T. martiale strain, with the germination percentage maintained above 90%. Once sprayed, the population of T. martiale tended to decrease progressively on the surface of cacao pods (similar to 30-40 days post-application), with a concomitant increase in the severity of pod disease. Production of 1.02 x 10(8) conidia g(-1) was obtained after culturing ALF 247 on solid substrate (rice grains) supplemented with calcium carbonate. The results indicate a clear-cut potential of the T. martiale ALF 247 to be used for control of Black-Pod Rot of cacao, although further studies are required to render this isolate technically and economically efficient as a biocontrol agent on agronomic scale. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据