4.4 Article

Long-term therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine and metabolites in psychiatric in- and outpatients

期刊

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 152, 期 1, 页码 80-86

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s002130000503

关键词

clozapine; TDM; metabolite ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Clozapine is a unique antipsychotic drug, outstanding for its lack of extrapyramidal side-effects and its superior efficacy in refractory schizophrenia. However, an unambiguous concentration-response relationship has not yet been established. Objective: We investigated serum concentrations of clozapine, norclozapine and clozapine-N-oxide in psychiatric in- and outpatients to identify particular metabolic patterns in clozapine responders and non-responders and putative threshold levels for clozapine response. Methods. Psychiatric assessments, CYP2D6 genotype, and weekly serum concentrations of clozapine, norclozapine and clozapine-N-oxide were obtained in 34 adult schizophrenic in-and outpatients (18 men, 16 women) during 10 weeks of clozapine treatment with a naturalistic dose design. Results: Responders (n=21) displayed significantly lower serum concentrations of clozapine corrected for dose compared to non-responders (n=13; P<0.05), while none of the other parameters (absolute clozapine concentration, metabolite ratios, gender) were different. Smokers had significantly lower dose-corrected clozapine concentrations. A positive correlation was observed between age and average steady state clozapine concentrations. Conclusions: These findings indicate a possible link between CYP activity and response to clozapine that is not mediated through differences in serum concentrations. No clinically meaningful pattern in serum parameters could be identified that differentiates responders from non-responders. Thus, clozapine TDM seems ineffective for predicting clinical response. Smoking behavior is a major determinant of clozapine clearance while CYP2D6 genotype does not impact clozapine disposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据