4.6 Article

Interference of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with biological control of the vine mealybug Planococcus ficus (Signoret) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae)

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
卷 49, 期 2, 页码 180-185

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.02.001

关键词

Anagyrus sp.; Anoplolepis steingroeveri; Ant species; Coccidoxenoides perminutus; Crematogaster peringueyi; Linepithema humile; Parasitism; Mortality; Trophobiosis

资金

  1. Deciduous Fruit Producers Trust (DFPT)
  2. THRIP
  3. Winetech

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anagyrus sp. and Coccidoxenoides perminutus are well known parasitoids used for the biological control of the vine mealybug Planococcus ficus, a key pest in vineyards. In South Africa, three ant species, Anoplolepis steingroeveri, Crematogaster peringueyi and Linepithema humile form a trophobiotic relationship with the vine mealybug in vineyards and promote the latter's infestations to unacceptable levels. In a manipulative laboratory experiment, ants and parasitoids were allowed to forage on vine mealybug-infested butternuts and numbers were recorded for a I min period at 10 min intervals for 2 h. Parasitoid mortality and the number of parasitized vine mealybug females were then recorded in the presence and absence of the three ant species. Data were analyzed using a repeated measures generalized linear model (GEEs). The mean number of ants and parasitoids on the mealybug-infested butternuts differed significantly between ant species and time intervals (p < 0.0001 in all cases). Crematogaster peringueyi and L. humile caused significantly higher mortality of both parasitoids than A. steingroeveri during the 24-h exposure period (p < 0.0001). Coccidoxenoides perminutus parasitized significantly more vine mealybugs than Anagyrus sp. for all treatments (p < 0.0001). Ants should therefore be controlled prior to release of parasitoids to suppress populations of ant-tended Hemiptera in vineyards. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据