4.6 Article

Measuring parasitoid movement from floral resources in a vineyard

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
卷 46, 期 2, 页码 107-113

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.03.016

关键词

Dolichogenidea tasmanica; Braconidae; Epiphyas postvittana; Tortricidae; conservation biological control; dispersal; mark-capture; agro-ecosystems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The movement of natural enemies from floral resources is of particular importance in habitat manipulation research, as the distances that they disperse have consequences for the deployment of floral resources to improve insect natural enemy fitness. A number of marking techniques can be used to measure natural enemy movement; however, many of these are labour-intensive and not appropriate for many natural enemy species, the alternative, self-marking techniques, are less common. The aim of this study was to determine whether rubidium chloride (RbCl) could be used to measure the movement of Dolichogenidea tasmanica (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from flowering buckwheat, Fagopyrum esculentum Moench plants in an organic vineyard. D. tasmanica is the most common parasitoid of leafroller larvae, a serious pest of grapevines in Australia and New Zealand. Foliar applications of rubidium chloride were made to a single strip of buckwheat in the centre of each of five vineyard areas. Sticky traps were placed in each area at distances of 0, 4, 10 and 30 m in opposite directions from the buckwheat to collect adult D. tasmanica. D. tasmanica were marked with rubidium after buckwheat plants had been sprayed with RbCl and were trapped up to 30 m from the plants within a seven-day sampling period. This study indicates that RbCl can be used to mark parasitoids to measure their movement from floral resources and may be used to inform decisions on the deployment of appropriate flowering plant species in conservation biological control. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据