4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Psychosocial and environmental correlates of violence perpetration among African-American urban youth

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 202-209

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00124-X

关键词

adolescence; violence; African-American; victim; witness; perpetration

资金

  1. AHRQ HHS [U01-HS07392] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To ascertain the proportion of youths involved in acts of violence; to examine individual, social, and environmental factors associated with perpetration; and to determine the relationship among victimization, witnessing, and perpetration of violence. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was completed by 349 volunteer males and females, aged 9-15 years, 96% of whom were African-American. The youths were recruited from recreation centers associated with 10 public-housing communities in an eastern city. Survey instruments included the Child Health and Illness Profile, Survey of Children's Exposure to Community Violence, and other standardized questionnaires. Statistical analyses included Chi-square, correlation, regression, and test for linear trends. Results: Half of the youths self-reported at least one act of violence perpetration, with similar distributions among males and females. One-third of the youths reported both personal victimization and the witnessing of violent events. Victim and witness status were moderately correlated. Individual risk behaviors and victimization made significant contributions to perpetration status. Further analysis demonstrated a linear relationship between acts of perpetration and number of victimization events. Conclusions: Participation in problem behaviors may place youths in circumstances in which they may be victim, witness, or aggressor. The chronic and high levels of community violence to which many youths are exposed are likely to contribute to an individual's participation in acts of violence. (C) Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2000.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据