4.4 Article

Genetic classification of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

期刊

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 1011-1017

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/hupa.2000.9782

关键词

combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma; loss of heterozygosity (LOH); clone; histologic diversity; genetics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (combined HCC/CC) is a rare form of liver neoplasms showing both hepatocellular (HCC) and bile duct differentiation (CC). In an attempt to clarify the clonality and genetic/phenotypic relationships in the evolution of these neoplasms, we microdissected multiple HCC and CC foci and studied allelic static; of chromosome arms 1p, 1q, 3p, 4q, 5q, 6q, 8p, 9p, 10q, 11q, 13q, 16q, 17p, 17q, 18q, and 22q. Overall, the highest frequency of loss of heterozygosity (LOW) was seen on 4q and 17p, followed by 8p and 16q. Of the 11 cases studied, 3 cases did not show any of the identical allelic losses between HCC and CC foci, indicating the biclonal nature. The remaining 8 cases showed multiple allelic losses shared between bath components, strongly suggestive of a single clonal derivation. Moreover, 4 of the 8 cases showed additional or divergent allelic losses at more than 1 chromosomal locus only in HCC and/or CC foci. Thus, this heterogeneity was shown to affect the phenotypic diversity of the tumor. Summarizing the genetic patterns, combined HCC/CC could be classified into the following 3 possibilities: (1) collision tumor in which 2 independent neoplastic clones develop at dose proximity; (2) single clonal tumor with homogeneous genetic background in both components-histological diversity is thus a manifestation of divergent differentiation potential of a single clone; (3) single clonal process in which genetic heterogeneity in the process of clonal evolution within the tumor parallels histologic diversity; therefore, the tumor in this category is mainly composed of mosaics of closely related subclones. Copyright (C) 2000 by W.B. Saunders Company.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据