Does mentor-protege agreement on mentor leadership behavior influence the quality of a mentoring relationship?

This study examined whether mentor-protege agreement regarding mentor transformational leadership behavior would influence the quality of mentoring relationships. Mentors in 199 mentor-protege dyads were classified as overestimators, underestimators, orin agreement based on the difference between mentor's self-rating and protege's rating of mentor's transformational leadership behaviors. Results of multivariate analysis of variance indicated that underestimator dyads experience the highest quality of mentoring relationships in terms of psychosocial support received, career development, and perceived mentoring effectiveness. The practical implications of these findings are discussed.