4.7 Article

Human-snow leopard conflicts in the Sanjiangyuan Region of the Tibetan Plateau

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 166, 期 -, 页码 118-123

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.024

关键词

Panthera uncia; Human-wildlife conflict; Traditional use; Livestock depredation; Economic value; Cultural image; Attitude

资金

  1. International Snow Leopard Trust
  2. Shanshui Conservation Center
  3. Qinghai Forestry Department
  4. Sanjiangyuan National Nature Reserve Administration
  5. Panthera

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conflicts between humans and snow leopards are documented across much of their overlapping distribution in Central Asia. These conflicts manifest themselves primarily in the form of livestock depredation and the killing of snow leopards by local herders. This source of mortality to snow leopards is a key conservation concern. To investigate human-snow leopard conflicts in the Sanjiangyuan Region of the Tibetan Plateau, we conducted household interviews about local herders' traditional use of snow leopard parts, livestock depredation, and overall attitudes towards snow leopards. We found most respondents (58%) knew that snow leopard parts had been used for traditional customs in the past, but they claimed not in the past two or three decades. It may be partly due to the issuing of the Protection of Wildlife Law in 1998 by the People's Republic of China. Total livestock losses were damaging (US$ 6193 per household in the past 1 year), however snow leopards were blamed by herders for only a small proportion of those losses (10%), as compared to wolves (45%) and disease (42%). Correspondingly, the cultural images of snow leopards were neutral (78%) and positive (9%) on the whole. It seems that human-snow leopard conflict is not intense in this area. However, snow leopards could be implicated by the retaliatory killing of wolves. We recommend a multi-pronged conservation program that includes compensation, insurance programs, and training local veterinarians to reduce livestock losses. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据